technology-consulting
Technology Consulting
Architecture review, migration strategy, and technical due diligence — senior engineers, no junior-heavy pyramid.
The problem we solve
Your team is shipping, but something is slowing them down: a platform decision that aged badly, a vendor lock-in you can't price, or a security posture that won't survive the next audit. You need a second set of eyes from people who have actually built and operated the thing — not a slide deck.
What you get
- Written architecture review with prioritized findings
- Migration or remediation plan with effort estimates
- Threat model and compliance gap analysis (SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, FIPS 140-3 where relevant)
- Hands-on pairing with your senior engineers for 2–4 weeks
- Go/no-go technical due diligence for M&A or investment
Stack we bring
- TypeScript, Python, Go, Rust
- AWS, GCP, Azure, on-prem / air-gapped
- Kubernetes, Nomad, Terraform, Pulumi
- PostgreSQL, Redis, Kafka, ClickHouse, MongoDB
- OpenTelemetry, Prometheus, Grafana, Datadog
Sample engagement
- Scope
- Architecture review of a payments platform pre-Series-B, ~120k LOC across TypeScript, Go, and Rust services.
- Duration
- 3 weeks, 0.5 FTE senior.
- Outcome
- Caught three latent concurrency bugs; cut projected infra spend 38% by reshaping the data layer.
Pricing
Sized off the engagement scope and the seniority needed. Most reviews are billed per engagement, not per hour.
Typical engagements run 2–4 weeks of senior bandwidth and produce a written deliverable you can act on.
Frequently asked
- Do you require access to our source code?
- Yes, read-only, under NDA. We can work off a thin fork or a read-only mirror; we don't need write access for a review engagement.
- Can you work against an existing RFC or design doc?
- That's the cheapest engagement shape. Send the doc; we return a written review with 5–15 concrete findings within two weeks.